The United States and the International Criminal Court Research Paper

The United States and the International guilty Court - research Paper ExampleIt officially came into existence in July 2002. This too marked the day when the President also signed the American Service members Protection Act (ASPA) restricting the U.S. from giving assistance to the ICC. The international norms as well as institutions have a significant effect on the states and individuals. The ICC is the worlds number one permanent judicial body with utmost jurisdiction to try those individuals who were accused of war umbrages or for that matter, wickedness against humanity (Eisea 2002). A large part of the United States distant policy is moving at a smooth pace. The situation in the United States and all over the world had begun to deteriorate as the crime rate started to increase. It is for this reason that the majority of the international states had decided to create an international court dealing with plug atrocities. This would non only help solve various criminal acts but also prohibit the dread(a) violation of human rights all across the world. There have been instances in the past whereby the United States underwent a great challenge from the International Criminal Court. United Nations and many other democratic nations have openly welcomed and supported the ICC for its performance, although the United States initially voted against the Statute of the International Criminal Court the reason being that ICC may assert jurisdiction over the U.S. soldiers charged with crime which would be a result of legitimate uses of military posture (Eisea 2002). As late as in 2005 the United States decided not to block a metier Security Council resolution indicating the situation in Darfur region of Sudan to the ICC prosecutor. The ICC depends on the support as well as cooperation by the States and other international organization (Taft & Wald 2009). The International Criminal Court jurisdiction extends to the most grievous crimes committed at international level. It thus becomes important for two reasons. It offers an advanced means to revise the foreign policies through alternatives especially after World War II. It extends its reach by offering substantial confide and underscoring the significance of international law (Sewall & Kaysen 2000). Even if the ICC acts alone or with a national court, it can bequeath a model for fair and deliberate administration of legal expert. With all the qualities it is equipped with, it faces countless uncertainties with regard to how it enforces justice and defines the interest that justice will serve. United States however is not concerned with these issues faces by the International Criminal Court. The main concerns that the United States shows towards the Court are objections in the legal framework on which the ICC is built. ICC must not be bound on all states irrespective of the war crimes each one of them have. Secondly the ICCs definitions of crimes such as genocide, war crimes and those pe rpetrated against humanity are narrower than the international law. The Rome Statute was seriously blemish according